Lies and Truths about Syria


For eight months, Western leaders and some public media have been agitating for a war in Syria. The extremely serious accusations leveled against Assad intimidate those who question the justification for a new military intervention. But not everyone, because - on the initiative of Voltaire Network - some came to Syria to investigate for themselves and were able to measure the extent of NATO’s propaganda. Thierry Meyssan reports on the state of the media war.

Four NATO lies

- 1. According to NATO and its Persian Gulf allies, for eight months mass demonstrations have taken place in Syria to demand more freedom and the departure of President Bashar al-Assad.
Not true. There have been demonstrations against President Bashar al-Assad’s, in some cities, at the call of Saudi and Egyptian preachers speaking on Al-Jazeera, but which rallied only some 100 000 people at the most. They were not claiming more freedom, but the establishment of an Islamic regime. They demanded the resignation of President al-Assad, not because of his politics, but because these protesters adhere to a sectarian strand of Sunni power, Takfirism, and they accuse Assad of being a heretic (he is Alawi) and of usurping power in a Muslim country, which they claim can only be legitimately governed by a Sunni from their theological school.
- 2. According to NATO and its Persian Gulf allies, the "regime" responded by using live ammunition to disperse the crowd, leaving at least 3,500 dead since the beginning of the year.
Not true. In the first place, it is not possible to suppress demonstrations that never existed. Then, from the outset, the authorities realized that efforts were afoot to provoke sectarian strife in a country where secularism has been the mainstay of the state since the eighth century. Consequently, President Bashar al-Assad prohibited security, police and army forces from using firearms in any circumstance where civilians might get hurt. The purpose is to prevent that the injuries, or even death, of a person belonging to one creed or the other, be exploited to justify a war of religion. This prohibition is respected by the security forces at the risk of their own lives, as we shall see later. As for the dead, their number should be cut in half. The majority (of the dead) are not civilians, but soldiers and police, as I was able to observe during my visits to hospitals and morgues, both civilian and military.
- 3. After we managed to break the wall of silence and got the big Western media to acknowledge the presence in Syria of death squads from abroad, setting up ambushes against the army and murdering civilians in the heart of the cities, NATO and its Gulf allies reported on the existence of an army of deserters. According to them, a group of military (not police) who had received the order to fire on the crowd allegedly rebelled. They apparently went underground and constituted the Free Syrian Army, already 1500 men-strong.
Not true. The deserters are only a few dozen, having fled to Turkey where they are supervised by an officer associated to the Hakim Rifaat el-Assad/Abdel Khaddam clan, famously linked to the CIA. There is, however, an increasing number of young people who refuse to do military service, more often under pressure from their families than by personal decision. Indeed, those soldiers who are caught in an ambush don’t have the right to use their firearms to defend themselves if civilians are on the scene. They have no choice but to sacrifice their lives if they are unable to escape.
- 4. According to NATO and its Persian Gulf allies, the cycle of revolution/repression has paved the way for the start of a "civil war". 1.5 million trapped Syrians would be suffering from hunger. It is therefore essential to set up "humanitarian corridors" to deliver food aid and allow civilians to flee the combat zones.
Not true. Considering the number and the cruelty of the attacks by death squads from abroad, population displacement has been minimal. Syria is agriculturally self-sufficient and its productivity has not declined significantly. On the other hand, with most of the ambushes taking place on major roads, traffic is frequently interrupted. Moreover, when attacks spring up inside the cities, merchants shut down their shops immediately. This results in serious distribution problems, including food. The real issue lies elsewhere: economic sanctions have wrought disaster. While for the past decade Syria had registered a growth of around 5% per year, it can no longer sell its oil to Western Europe and its tourist industry has been hit hard. Many people have lost their jobs and income, having to save on everything. They are subsidized by the government, which distributes free food and heating fuel. Under such circumstances, it would be more fitting to say that if it were not for the Al-Assad government, 1.5 million Syrians would be suffering from malnutrition because of Western sanctions.
Ultimately, while we’re still in the stage of unconventional warfare, with the use of mercenaries and special forces to destabilize the country, the narrative spewed out by NATO and its Persian Gulf allies has already strayed from reality. This gap will widen more and more.
As far as you are concerned, dear reader, there is no reason why you should believe me rather than NATO, since you are not on the spot. However, there are several elements that should send up a red flag.
Bernard-Henry Levy, who boasted of having embroiled France in the war on Libya to serve Israel’s interests, told "Le Parisien" that he 
 has a hit list of countries.

Four clues carefully hidden by NATO

  - 1. One would think that the charges concerning the alleged repression and the number of victims were carefully looked into. But not at all. They originated from a single source: the Syrian Observatory of Human Rights, based in London, whose leaders demand anonymity. What is the validity of such grave accusations if they are not cross-checked and why do institutions such as the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights rubber stamp them without verifying their authenticity?
- 2. Russia and China vetoed a draft Security Council resolution meant to pave the way for an international military intervention. NATO political leaders have forlornly explained that the Russians are protecting their naval base at Tartus and that the Chinese will do anything to scrape together a few barrels of oil. Should we accept the Manichean view that Washington, London and Paris are guided by good intentions, while Moscow and Beijing are essentially selfish and insensitive to the martyrdom of the population? How to avoid noticing that Russia and China have much less of an interest in defending Syria than Westerners have in destroying it?
- 3. It is somewhat bizarre to observe who makes up the coalition of so-called well-intentioned states. How can it escape anyone’s notice that the two main sustainers of the Arab League and promoters of the "democratization" of Syria, Saudi Arabia and Qatar, are puppet dictatorships in lockstep with the United States and the United Kingdom? Should not one wonder how credible the West can be - after having successively ravaged Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya and killing more than 1, 2 million people in ten years, thus showing how little value they attach to human life - when it waves a humanitarian banner?
- 4. To avoid being manipulated on the events unfolding in Syria, the best thing is to put them in context. For NATO and its Persian Gulf allies, whose armies invaded Yemen and Bahrain to savagely quell peaceful demonstrations, the "Syrian Revolution" is an extension of the "Arab spring", perceived by them as peoples in the region who dream of a market democracy and the comfort of the American Way of Life. On their part, the Russians and Chinese, apace with the Venezuelans and the South Africans, recognize the events in Syria as the continuation of Washington’s plan "to remodel the Greater Middle East", which has already claimed 1.2 million lives and which anyone truly concerned about protecting human lives must strive to put an end to. They haven’t forgotten that on 15 September 2001, President George W. Bush green-lighted a plan to wage seven wars.
Preparations for the attack on Syria formally began on 12 December 2003 with the adoption of the Syrian Accountability Act in the wake of the fall of Baghdad. Since that day, the president of the United States - today Barack Obama - is under an order from Congress to attack Syria and is dispensed from any further clearance before launching hostilities. Therefore, the question is not whether NATO has found a divine justification for going to war, but whether Syria will find a way out of this situation, in the same way she outmaneuvered all the previous pitfalls and defamatory accusations leveled against her, such as the assassination of Rafik Hariri and the Israeli raid against an imaginary nuclear military plant.

Western mainstream media testify

At the end of this article, I would like to underscore that Voltaire Network facilitated a press visit to Syria, organized at the initiative of the Catholic Information Center of Middle East Christians, as part of the opening towards Western media announced by President al-Assad at the Arab League. We assisted mainstream journalists to travel to combat zones. At first, our colleagues were wary of our presence, both because they had negative preconceived ideas about us to us and because they thought we were trying to brainwash them. They eventually came to realize that we are normal people and that the fact of having chosen our camp did not mean we had renounced our critical spirit. In the end, though still convinced of NATO’s benevolence and while failing to share our commitment to anti-imperialist, they opened their eyes and ears to the truth.
Currently, their reports honestly reflect the actions perpetrated by the armed gangs that are terrorizing the country. Of course, they have refrained from openly contradicting the Atlantic version and tried to reconcile it with what they saw and heard, which called for some awkward contortions around the concept of a ’civil war’ allegedly pitting the Syrian army against foreign mercenaries. Nevertheless, reports by Télévision Belge(RTBF) and La Libre Belgique, to name a few, now clearly reveal that for eight months NATO has masked the actions of death squads and falsely attributed their crimes to the Syrian authorities.
VOLTAIRE NETWORK | DAMASCUS (SYRIA) 

Source: 

"Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order" Review of F. William Engdahl's book



For over 30 years, F. William Engdahl has been a leading researcher, economist, and analyst of the New World Order with extensive writing to his credit on energy, politics, and economics. He contributes regularly to business and other publications, is a frequent speaker on geopolitical, economic and energy issues, and is a distinguished Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization.

Engdahl's two previous books include "A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order" explaining that America's post-WW II dominance rests on two pillars and one commodity - unchallengeable military power and the dollar as the world's reserve currency along with the quest to control global oil and other energy resources.

Engdahl's other book is titled "Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation" on how four Anglo-American agribusiness giants plan world domination by patenting all life forms to force-feed GMO foods on everyone - even though eating them poses serious human health risks.

Engdahl's newest book is reviewed below. Titled "Full Strectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order," it discusses America's grand strategy, first revealed in the 1998 US Space Command document - Vision for 2020. Later released in 2000 as DOD Joint Vision 2020, it called for "full spectrum dominance" over all land, surface and sub-surface sea, air, space, electromagnetic spectrum and information systems with enough overwhelming power to fight and win global wars against any adversary, including with nuclear weapons preemptively.

Other means as well, including propaganda, NGOs and Color Revolutions for regime change, expanding NATO eastward, and "a vast array of psychological and economic warfare techniques" as part of a "Revolution in Military Affairs" discussed below.

September 11, 2001 served as pretext to consolidate power, destroy civil liberties and human rights, and wage permanent wars against invented enemies for global dominance over world markets, resources, and cheap labor - at the expense of democratic freedoms and social justice. Engdahl's book presents a frightening view of the future, arriving much sooner than most think.

Introduction
After the Soviet Union's dissolution in late 1989, America had a choice. As the sole remaining superpower, it could have worked for a new era of peace and prosperity, ended decades of Cold War tensions, halted the insane arms race, turned swords into plowshares, and diverted hundreds of billions annually from "defense" to "rebuild(ing) civilian infrastructure and repair(ing) impoverished cities."

Instead, Washington, under GHW Bush and his successors, "chose stealth, deception, lies and wars to attempt to control the Eurasian Heartland - its only potential rival as an economic region - by military (political, and economic) force," and by extension planet earth through an agenda later called "full spectrum dominance."

As a result, the Cold War never ended and today rages with over a trillion dollars spent annually on "defense" in all forms even though America has no enemy, nor did it after the Japanese surrendered in August 1945. So the solution was to invent them, and so they were.

Post-Soviet Russia, "The 'new' Cold War assumed various disguises and deceptive tactics until September 11, 2001" changed the game. It let George Bush "declare (a) permanent (Global War on Terror) against an enemy who was everywhere and nowhere, who allegedly threatened the American way of life, justified (police state) laws," and is now destroying our freedoms and futures.

The roots of the scheme go back decades - at least to 1939 when powerful New York Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) insiders planned a post-war world with one nation alone triumphant and unchallengeable.

Engdahl's book is a geopolitical analysis of the past two decades - peering into "the dark corners of Pentagon strategy and actions and the extreme dangers ('full spectrum dominance' holds for) the future," not just to America but the entire world.

Things are so out-of-control today that democratic freedoms and planetary life itself are threatened by "the growing risk of nuclear war by miscalculation" or the foolhardy assumption that waging it can be limited, controlled, and safe - like turning a faucet on and off. The very notion is implausible and reckless on its face, yet powerful forces in the country think this way and plan accordingly.

The Guns of August 2008
On the 8th day of the 8th month of the 8th year of the new century, a place few people in the West ever heard of made headlines when Georgia's army invaded South Ossetia - its province that broke away in 1991 and declared its independence. For a brief period, world tensions were more heightened than at any time since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis when only cooler heads avoided possible nuclear war.

Like then, the crisis was a Washington provocation with tiny Georgia a mere pawn in a dangerous high-stakes confrontation - a new Great Game that former National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski described in his 1997 book, "The Grand Chessboard."

He called Eurasia the "center of world power extending from Germany and Poland in the East through Russia and China to the Pacific and including the Middle East and the Indian subcontinent." He explained that America's urgent task was to assure that "no state or combination of states gains the capacity to expel the United States from Eurasia or even to diminish significantly its decisive arbitration role." Dominating that part of the world is key to controlling the planet, and its the main reason for NATO's existence. From inception, its mission was offense.

Post-Cold War, Washington used the illusion of democracy to dominate everywhere - with the long arm of the Pentagon and NATO as enforcers. Euphoric East Europeans couldn't know that American-style democracy was even more repressive than what had ended. Decades of Voice of America and Radio Free Europe propaganda was soon revealed to be no different than the Soviet system they rejected and in some ways much worse.

Western-imposed "shock therapy" meant "free market" hokum, mass privatizations, ending the public sphere, unrestricted access for foreign corporations unemcumbered by pesky regulations, deep social service cuts, loss of job security, poverty wages, repressive laws, and entire economies transformed to benefit a powerful corporate ruling class partnered with corrupted political elites. Globally, Russia got billionaire "oligarchs," China "the princelings," Chile "the piranhas," and in new millennium America the Bush-Cheney "Pioneers" and Obama Wall Street Top Guns wrecking global havoc for self-enrichment.

As for ordinary people, Russia is instructive for what's heading everywhere:

-- mass impoverishment;

-- an epidemic of unemployment;

-- loss of pensions and social benefits;

-- 80% of farmers bankrupted;

-- tens of thousands of factories closed and the country de-industrialized;

-- schools closed;

-- housing in disrepair;

-- skyrocketing alcoholism, drug abuse, HIV/AIDS, suicides, and violent crime; and

-- a declining population and life expectancy because the country was looted for profit and all safety nets ended; what Milton Friedman called "freedom."

Mikhail Gorvachev tried to revitalize Soviet Russia with Glasnost and Perestroika but failed. In return for agreeing to "shock therapy" and nuclear disarmament, GHW Bush promised no eastward NATO extension into newly liberated Warsaw Pact countries. The Russian Duma, in fact, ratified Start II, providing a firm disarmament schedule - contingent on both countries prohibiting a missile defense deployment as stipulated under the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (ABM).

On December 14, 2001, the Bush administration withdrew from ABM and much more. It claimed the right to develop and test new nuclear weapons (in violation of NPT), rescinded the Biological and Toxic Weapons Convention, greatly increased military spending, refused to consider a Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty to increase already large stockpiles, and claimed the right to wage preventive wars under the doctrine of "anticipatory self-defense" using first-strike nuclear weapons.

The door was now open for enhanced militarization, creation of the US Missile Defense Agency, and proof again that trusting America is foolhardy and dangerous. Both GHW Bush and Bill Clinton lied by enticing former Warsaw Pact countries into NATO, one by one.

At the beginning of the 1990s, Zbigniew Brzezinski described America's arrogance this way:

"Presidential travels abroad assumed the trappings of imperial expeditions, overshadowing in scale and security demands the circumstances of any other statesman (reflecting) America's anointment as the world's leader (to be) in some respects reminiscent of Napoleon's self-coronation."
Brzezinski understood the dangers of imperial arrogance, causing the decline and fall of previous empires. Even a superpower like the US is vulnerable. He was very comfortable with an American Century, only leery of the means to achieve and keeping it. In 2008, with 28 NATO country members, including 10 former Warsaw Pact ones, Washington sought admission for Georgia and Ukraine, and did so after announcing in early 2007 the planned installation of interceptor missiles in Poland and advanced tracking radar in the Czech Republic, both NATO members.

Allegedly for defense against Iran and other "rogue" states, it clearly targeted Russia by guaranteeing America a nuclear first-strike edge, and that provoked a sharp Kremlin response. Washington's deployment is for offense as are all US/NATO installations globally.

Vladimir Putin expressed outrage in his February 2007 Munich International Conference on Security address stating:

"NATO has put its frontline forces on our borders. (It) does not have any relation with the modernisation of the Alliance itself or with ensuring security in Europe. On the contrary, it represent a serious provocation that reduces the level of mutual trust. And we have a right to ask: against whom is this expansion intended? And what happened to the assurances our western partners made after the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact?"

Putin's speech drew a storm of US media Russia-bashing. Last August, it got this writer to comment in an article titled "Reinventing the Evil Empire," saying: Russia is back, proud and re-assertive, and not about to roll over for America, especially in Eurasia. For Washington, it's back to the future with a new Cold War, but this time for greater stakes and with much larger threats to world peace.

Over the past two decades, Washington upped the ante, encroaching on Russia's borders and encircling it with NATO/US bases clearly designed for offense and to block the spread of democratic freedoms to former Soviet Republics. "Diabolical propaganda" made it work by projecting imperial America as a colonial liberator bringing "free market" capitalism to the East. It succeeded as "long as the United States was the world's largest economy and American dollars were in demand as (the) de facto world reserve currency...." For decades, America "portray(ed) itself as the beacon of liberty for newly independent nations of Africa and Asia," as well as former Soviet Republics and Warsaw Pact nations.

Geopolitical Reality - America's New Manifest Destiny, Global Expansion to the Vastness of Eurasia
For over a century, America sought "total economic and military control over (Soviet) Russia" through the full strength of its military-industrial-security sectors - by war or other means. From 1945, the Pentagon planned a first-strike nuclear war, an "all out conventional war (called) TOTALITY (as) drafted by General Dwight Eisenhower" per Harry Truman's order, the same man who used atomic weapons against a defeated Japan instead of accepting its requested surrender.

With the dissolution of the Soviet Union, America's superpower supremacy depends on "precluding Eurasian countries from developing their own defense pillars or security structures independent of US-controlled NATO," especially to prevent a powerful China-Russia alliance capable of serious challenge, along with other Eurasian states, notably oil rich ones.

As geopolitical strategist Halford Mackinder (1861 - 1947) observed in his most famous dictum:

"Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland;
Who rules the Heartland commands the World-Island;
Who rules the World-Island commands the World."

Mackinder's World-Island was Eurasia, all of Europe, the Middle East and Asia.

Early in the last century and notably post-WW II, America determined to rule even at the risk of all out nuclear war. For its part, Britain intended to stay in the game, and in April 1945, Winston Churchill urged Dwight Eisenhower and Franklin Roosevelt "to launch an immediate full-scale war against the Soviet Union, using up to 12 captured German divisions (as) cannon fodder to destroy Russia once and for all."

Instead, Washington invented a post-war enemy, and got Europe and Asian countries to feel threatened enough to agree to US dictates, even ones contrary to their own interests. As for America, in 1945, Truman ordered Eisenhower "to prepare secret plans for a surprise nuclear strike on some (Soviet) cities (despite knowing the Kremlin) posed no direct or immediate threat to the United States" or its close allies.

A nuclear-armed Russia with intercontinental missile capabilities halted the threat - until the 2001 Bush Doctrine asserted the right to wage preventive wars, with first-strike nuclear weapons, to depose foreign regimes perceived dangerous to US security and interests. That was the strategy behind the 2008 Georgian conflict that could have escalated into nuclear war.

Defused for the moment, "a number of leading US policy makers (see Russia today) as unfinished business (and seek its) complete dismemberment (as) an independent pivot for Eurasia." Nuclear superiority, encirclement, and "diabolical propaganda" are three tools among others to finish the job and leave America the sole remaining superpower. Disempowering Russia and China will create an open field for a "total global American Century - the realization of 'full spectrum dominance,' as the Pentagon called it."

Today, under Obama as under Bush, the risk of nuclear war by miscalculation is highest in nearly half a century. With America the clear aggressor, Russia may feel its only option is strike first while able or delay and face the consequences when it's too late. The closer offensive nuclear missiles are to its borders, the nearer it gets to disempowerment, further dismemberment, and possible nuclear annihilation.

Its reaction left few doubts of its response. In February 2007, Strategic Rocket Forces commander Col. Gen. Nikolai Solovtsov said "Moscow would target US Ballistic Missile Defense sites with its nuclear arsenal if Washington" proceeded with its plans. Putin delivered harsh rhetoric and announced Russia would spend $190 billion over the next eight years to modernize its military by 2015 and that state-of-the-art weapons would take precedence. His message was clear. A New Cold War/nuclear arms race was on with Russia ready to contend "out of national survival considerations," not a desire for confrontation.

"Missile Defense" for Offense

On March 23, 1983, Ronald Reagan proposed the idea in a speech calling for greater Cold War military spending, including a huge R & D program for what became known as "Star Wars" - in impermeable anti-missile space shield called the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). The idea then (and now) was fantasy, but a glorious one for defense contractors who've profited hugely ever since.

The Clinton administration gave it modest support until the National Missile Defense Act of 1999 proposed an active missile defense "as soon as is technologically possible...."

When George Bush became president, Donald Rumsfeld wanted war preparations to include missile defense and space-based weapons to destroy targets anywhere in the world quickly for "full spectrum dominance." The strategy included "deployment of a revolutionary new technique of regime change to impose or install 'US-friendly' regimes throughout the former Soviet Union and across Eurasia."

Controlling Russia - Color Revolutions and Swarming Coups
"Swarming" is a RAND Corporation term referring to "communication patterns and movement of" bees and other insects and applying it to military conflict by other means. It plays out through covert CIA actions to overthrow democratically elected governments, remove foreign leaders and key officials, prop up friendly dictators, and target individuals anywhere in the world.

Also through propaganda and activities of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), the International Republican Institute (IRI), and National Democratic Institute (NDI) - posing as NGOs but, in fact, are US government-funded organizations charged with subverting democracy, uprooting it where it exists, or preventing its creation by criminally disruptive means. Methods include non-violent strikes, mass street protests, and major media agitprop for regime change - much like what's now playing out in Iran after its presidential election.

Other recent examples include the Belgrade 2000 coup against Slobodan Misosevic, Georgia's 2003 Rose Revolution ousting Eduard Shevardnadze for the US-installed stooge, Mikheil Saakashvili, and the 2004-05 Ukraine Orange Revolution, based on faked electoral fraud, to install another Washington favorite, Viktor Yushchenko. The idea is to isolate Russia by cutting off its economic lifeline - the "pipeline networks that (carry its) huge reserves of oil and natural gas from the Urals and Serbia to Western Europe and Eurasia..." They run through Ukraine, a nation "so intertwined (with Russia) economically, socially and culturally, especially in the east of the country, that they were almost indistinguishable from one another."

Achieving geopolitical aims this way is far simpler and cheaper than waging wars "while convincing the world (that regime change was the result of) spontaneous outbursts for freedom. (It's) a dangerously effective weapon."

In 1953, cruder CIA methods toppled democratically elected Iranian Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh - the agency's first successful coup d'etat to install Reza Shah Pahlavi, the Shah of Iran.

In 1954, it deposed the popularly elected Jacobo Arbenz and replaced him with a military dictator - on the pretext of removing a non-existent communist threat. Arbenz, like other targets, threatened US business interests by favoring land reform, strong unions, and wealth distribution to alleviate extreme poverty in their countries.

Short of war, various tactics aim to prevent them: "propaganda, stuffed ballot boxes, bought elections, extortion, blackmail, sexual intrigue, false stories about opponents in the local media, transportation strikes, infiltration and disruption of opposing political parties, kidnapping, beating, torture, intimidation, economic sabotage, death squads and even assassination (culminating in) a military (or other coup to install) a 'pro-American' right-wing dictator" - while claiming it's democracy in action. For decades, countries in Latin America, the Middle East, and other world regions have been frequent victims.

Since the CIA's 1947 creation, "national security" and a fake communist threat justified every imaginable crime from propaganda to economic warfare, sabotage, assassinations, coup d'etats, torture, foreign wars and much more.

However, by the 1960s, new forms of covert regime change emerged along the lines that RAND studies called "swarming" - the idea being to develop social manipulation techniques or disruptive outbreaks short of wars or violent uprisings. After 2000, as mentioned above, they played out in Central Europe's Color Revolutions. According to State Department and intelligence community officials, "It seemed to be the perfect model for eliminating regimes opposed to US policy," whether or not popularly elected. Every regime is now vulnerable to "new methods of warfare" by other means, including economic ones very much in play now and earlier.

Organizations like the Gene Sharp Albert Einstein Institution, George Soros' Open Society Foundation, Freedom House and others are very much involved, and Sharp's web site admits being active with "pro-democracy" groups in Burma, Thailand, Tibet, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Belarus, and Serbia. They all conveniently "coincided with the US State Department's targets for regime change over the same period."

Eurasian Pipeline Wars
Central to the current conflict is control of the region's vast oil and gas reserves, and as long as Russia can use its resources "to win economic allies in Western Europe, China, and elsewhere, it (can't) be politically isolated." As a result, Moscow reacts harshly to military encirclement and bordering Color Revolutions - hostile acts, the geopolitical equivalence of war.

For America to remain the sole superpower, controlling global oil and gas flows is crucial along with cutting off China from Caspian Sea reserves and securing the energy routes and networks between Russia and the EU.

It's why America invaded and occupies Afghanistan and Iraq, incited Baltic wars in the 1990s, attacked Kosovo and Serbia in 1999, threatens Iran repeatedly and imposes sanctions, and keeps trying to oust Hugo Chavez. For its part under Vladimir Putin, Russia's economy began to grow for the first time in decades. It's rich in oil and gas, and uses them strategically to gain influence enough to rival Washington, especially in alliance with China and other former Soviet states like Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan, united in the 2001-formed Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Iran and India having observer status.

Under Bush-Cheney, Washington reacted aggressively. "full spectrum dominance" is the aim with Russia and China the main targets. Controlling world energy resources is central, and nothing under Obama has changed. Iraq's occupation continues and Afghanistan operations are enhanced with increased troop deployments under newly appointed General Stanley McChrystal's command - a hired gun, a man with a reputation for brutishness that includes torture, assassinations, indifference to civilian deaths, and willingness to destroy villages to save them.

As long as Russia and China stay free from US control, "full spectrum dominance" is impossible. Encircling the former with NATO bases, Color Revolutions, and incorporating former Soviet states into NATO and the EU are all part of the same grand strategy - "deconstruct(ing) Russia once and for all as a potential rival to a sole US Superpower hegemony."

Vladimir Putin stands in the way, "a dynamic nationalist (leader) committed to rebuilding" his country. In 2003, a defining geopolitical event occurred when Putin had billionaire oligarch, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, arrested on charges of tax evasion and put his shares in giant Yukos Oil group under state control.

It followed a decisive Russian Duma (lower house) election in which Khodorkovsky "was reliably alleged" to have used his wealth for enough votes to gain a majority - to challenge Putin in 2004 for president. Khodorkovsky violated his pledge to stay out of politics in return for keeping his assets and stolen billions provided he repatriate enough of them back home.

His arrest also came after a report surfaced about a meeting with Dick Cheney in Washington, followed by others with ExxonMobil and ChevronTexaco. They discussed acquiring a major stake of up to 40% of Yukos or enough to give Washington and Big Oil "de facto veto power over future Russian oil and gas pipelines and oil deals." Khodorkovsky also met with GHW Bush and had ties to the Carlyle Group, the influential US firm with figures like James Baker one of its partners.

Had Exxon and Chevron consummated the deal, it would have been an "energy coup d'etat. Cheney knew it; Bush knew it; Khodorkovsky knew it. Above all, Vladimir Putin knew it and moved decisively to block it" and hit hard on Khodorkosky in the process. It "signaled a decisive turn....towards rebuilding Russia and erecting strategic defenses." By late 2004, Moscow understood that a New Cold War was on over "strategic energy control and unilateral nuclear primacy," and Putin moved from defense to a "new dynamic offensive aimed at securing a more viable geopolitical position by using (Russia's) energy as the lever."

It involves reclaiming Russia's oil and gas reserves given away by Boris Yeltsin. Also strengthening and modernizing the country's military and nuclear deterrent to enhance its long-term security. Russia remains a military powerhouse and displays impressive technology at international trade shows, including the S-300 and more powerful S-400, reportedly more potent than comparable US systems.

Controlling China with Synthetic Democracy

From the 1940s to today, America's China strategy has been "divide and conquer," only tactics have varied from "big stick" to "carrot-and-stick" diplomacy. Key is to keep Russia and China from cooperating economically and militarily, "maintain a strategy of tension across Asia, and particularly Eurasia" (that, of course includes the Middle East and its oil riches) - for the overarching goal of total "control of China as the potential economic colossus of Asia."

With America embroiled in Eurasian wars, policy now "masquerad(es) behind the issues of human rights and 'democracy' as weapons of psychological and economic warfare."

Another initiative as well is ongoing - the 2007 AFRICOM authorization, the US Africa Command to control the continent's 53 countries no differently than the rest of the world, using military force as necessary. China's increasing need for Africa's resources (including oil), not terrorism, is the reason.

The 2008 Army Modernization Strategy (AMS) focuses on "full spectrum dominance," controlling world resources, and the prospect of wars for three to four decades to secure them. China and Russia are most feared as serious competitors - the former for its explosive economic growth and resource requirements and the latter for its energy, other raw material riches, and military strength.

AMS also included another threat - "population growth" threatening America and the West with "radical ideologies" and hence instability as well as unwanted "resource competition" that expanding economies require - everything from food to water, energy and other raw materials. These issues lay behind AFRCOM's creation and strategy for hardline militarism globally.

America's second president, John Adams, once said: "there are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by debt," or more broadly economic warfare. With much of US manufacturing offshored in China, both methods are constrained so an alternative scheme is used - human rights and democracy by an America disdaining both at home or abroad.

Nonetheless, in 2004, the State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor targeted China on these issues with millions in funding, headed by a right-wing conservative, Paula Dobriansky. She's a CFR member, NED vice chairman, Freedom House board member, senior fellow at the neo-conservative Hudson Institute, and member of the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) at which she endorsed attacking Iraq in 1998. Now she targets China with "soft warfare" strategy that's just as deadly.

Other tools include the Dalai Lama organizations in Tibet, Falun Gong in China, "an arsenal of (global) NGOs" carefully recruited for their mission, and, of course, the Western media, including public television and radio in America and BBC globally.

Weaponizing Human Rights - From Darfur to Myanmar to Tibet
In targeting China, Washington's human rights/democracy offensive focused on Myanmar, Tibet, and oil-rich Darfur. Called the "Saffron Revolution" in Myanmar (formerly Burma), it featured Western media images of saffron-robed Buddhist Monks on Yangon (formerly Rangoon) streets calling for more democracy. "Behind the scenes, however, was a battle of major geopolitical consequence" with Myanmar's people mere props for a Washington-hatched scheme - employing Eurasian Color Revolution tactics:

-- "hit-and-run swarming" mobs of monks;

-- connecting protest groups through internet blogs and mobile text-messaging links; and

-- having command-and-control over protest cells, dispersed and re-formed as ordered with no idea who pulled the strings or why - a hidden sinister objective  targeting China for greater geopolitical control and destabilizing Myanmar to do it.

Also at stake is control of vital sea lanes from the Persian Gulf to the South China Sea with the Myanmar coastline "providing shipping and naval access to one of the world's most strategic waterways, the Strait of Malacca, the narrow ship passage between Malaysia and Indonesia."

Since 9/11, the Pentagon tried but failed to militarize the region except for an airbase on Indonesia's northernmost tip. Myanmar rejected similar overtures - hence its being targeted for its strategic importance. "The Strait of Malacca, linking the Indian and Pacific Oceans, (is) the shortest sea route between the Persian Gulf and China. (It's) the key chokepoint in Asia" so controlling it is key. China has close ties to Myanmar. It's provided billions in military assistance and developed the infrastructure. The country is also oil-rich, on its territory and offshore.

China is the world's fastest growing energy market. Over 80% of its oil imports pass through the Strait. Controlling it keeps a chokehold over China's life-line, and if it's ever closed, about half the world's tanker fleet would have thousands of extra miles to travel at far higher freight costs.

In summer 2007, Myanmar and PetroChina signed a long-term Memorandum of Understanding - to supply China with substantial natural gas from its Shwe gas field in the Bay of Bengal. India was the main loser after China offered to invest billions for a strategic China-Myanmar oil and gas pipeline across the country to China's Yunnan Province. The same pipeline could give China access to Middle East and African oil by bypassing the Malacca Strait. "Myanmar would become China's 'bridge' linking Bangladesh and countries westward to the China mainland" trumping Washington should it succeed in controlling the Strait - a potential geopolitical disaster America had to prevent, hence the 2007 "Saffron Revolution" that failed.

India's Dangerous Alliance Shift
From 2005, India was "pushed into a strategic alliance with Washington" to counter China's growing influence in Asia and to have a "capable partner who can take on more responsibility for low-end operations" - directed at China and to provide bases and access to project US power in the region. To sweeten the deal, the Bush administration offered to sell (nuclear outlaw) India advanced nuclear technology. At the same time, it bashed Iran for its legitimate commercial operations, and now Obama threatens hardened sanctions and perhaps war without year end 2009 compliance with clearly outrageous demands.


Part II continues Engdahl's important analysis to conclusion.

Stephen Lendman is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization. He lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to The Global Research News Hour on RepublicBroadcasting.org Monday - Friday at 10AM US Central time for cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on world and national issues. All programs are archived for easy listening.



Source: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14046

Silahli Kuvvetlerin Fetullah'cilara yer acmak icin tasviyesi


Ağustos 2011 Yüksek Askeri Şura (YAŞ) toplantısında alınan terfi, temdit ve emeklilik kararlarının akabinde Türk Silahlı Kuvvetleri'ndeki general ve amiral sayısı 372'ye ulaştı.
Ordudaki general ve amiral sayısı 2010 YAŞ toplantısından önce 367 idi. Bu toplantı sırasında, haklarında açılmış davalar bulunan general ve amirallerin bir üst rütbeye terfi ettirilmesi konusunda hükümet kanadı ile askerler arasında görüş ayrılığı çıkmıştı. Söz konusu terfi krizi 2 general ve 1 amiralin 22 Kasım 2010'da Milli Savunma ve İçişleri Bakanlarınca açığa alınmasıyla sonuçlandı. Yaşanan bu gerilimli sürecin sonrasında Genelkurmay Başkanlığı 2010 YAŞ kararlarını, önceki yıllarda yaptığının aksine kurumun web sitesinde ilan etmedi. Görev süresi uzatılan general ve amiral sayısı ile kimliklerini başka bir kaynaktan öğrenmek mümkün olmadığından 2010 YAŞ toplantısı akabinde ortaya çıkan general ve amiral sayısı net olarak öğrenilemedi. Hatta şu anda bile 22 Kasım 2010 tarihinde açığa alınan 3 general ve amiralin muvazzaf mı yoksa emekli mi olduğu kesin olarak bilinmemektedir. Bir görüşe göre haklarında açılan davalar sonuçlanana kadar muvazzaf sayılmakta ve bu nedenle de medyada çıkan tutuklu muvazzaf general ve amiraller listesinde yer almaktadırlar.
YAŞ toplantıları akabinde, 2008 yılından itibaren Resmi Gazete'de yayınlanan terfi listeleri ve Genelkurmay Başkanlığı'nın resmi web sitesinde 2010 yılı dışında yayınlanan YAŞ kararlarına dayanılarak yapılan araştırmaya göre şu anda muvazzaf bulunan 372 general ve amiralin (22 Kasım 2010'da açığa alınan 2 general ve 1 amiral d'hil) görev yerlerine göre dökümü şöyle:
Kara Kuvvetleri Komutanlığı'nda 195,
Deniz Kuvvetleri Komutanlığı'nda 54,
Hava Kuvvetleri Komutanlığı'nda 69,
Jandarma Genel Komutanlığı'nda 34,
GATA'da 16,
AYİM ve Askeri Yargıtay'da 2,
Sahil Güvenlik Komutanlığı'nda 2
TOPLAM: 372
Rütbelere göre tasnif edilecek olursa halen TSK'da 14 orgeneral ve oramiral, 43 korgeneral ve koramiral, 101 tümgeneral ve tümamiral, 214 tuğgeneral ve tuğamiral görev yapıyor.
TSK'da mevcut 372 general ve amiralden 47'si çeşitli davalar sebebiyle tutuklu bulunuyor. Ayrıca 6 general ve amiral hakkında da yakalama kararı var. 24 Ağustos 2011'de tutuklanan ve 30 Ağustos 2011 itibariyle emekli olacak Tuğamiral Alaettin Sevim bu sayıya dahil bulunmuyor.
Tutukluluk oranı Deniz Kuvvetlerinde en yüksek seviyede bulunuyor. 54 muvazzaf amiralin 18'inin tutuklu bulunduğu bu kuvvette muvazzaf tutuklu oranı yüzde 33'ün üzerinde. Başka bir deyişle her 3 amiralden biri tutuklu. Kara ve Hava Kuvvetlerinde bu oran sırasıyla yüzde 10 ve yüzde 17. Genelde ise yüzde 14.
Tutuklu olan, hakkında yakalama kararı bulunan ve açığa alınan 53 general ve amiralin dışında fiilen görev başında bulunan general ve amiral sayısı ise 319.
Tutuklanan veya hakkında yakalama kararı bulunan 53 muvazzaf general ve amiralin isimleri şöyle:
KARA KUVVETLERİ KOMUTANLIĞI
1. ORG. HÜSEYİN NUSRET TAŞDELER (Teslim olmadı)
2. KORG. İSMAİL HAKKI PEKİN (Teslim olmadı)
3. KORG. NEJAT BEK
4. KORG. MUSTAFA KORKUT ÖZARSLAN
5. KORG. YURDAER OLCAN
6. KORG. MEHMET ERÖZ (Teslim olmadı)
7. TÜMG. AHMET YAVUZ
8. TÜMG. SALİM ERKAL BEKTAŞ
9. TÜMG. ABDULLAH DALAY
10. TÜMG. İHSAN BALABANLI
11. TÜMG. GÜRBÜZ KAYA
12. TÜMG. HASAN FEHMİ CANAN
13. TÜMG. BEKİR MEMİŞ
14. TÜMG. MUSTAFA BAKICI (Teslim olmadı)
15. TÜMG. NURETTİN IŞIK
16. TÜMG. HIFZI ÇUBUKLU
17. TUĞG. KASIM ERDEM
18. TUĞG. GÖKHAN GÖKAY
19. TUĞG. HAKAN AKKOÇ
DENİZ KUVVETLERİ KOMUTANLIĞI
1. KORA. MEHMET OTUZBİROĞLU
2. KORA. KADİR SAĞDIÇ
3. KORA. DENİZ CORA
4. TÜMA. HAYDAR MÜCAHİT ŞİŞLİOĞLU
5. TÜMA. RAMAZAN CEM GÜRDENİZ
6. TÜMA. SONER POLAT
7. TÜMA. ALİ SEMİH ÇETİN
8. TÜMA. ERDEM CANER BENER
9. TÜMA. AHMET SİNAN ERTUĞRUL (Teslim olmadı)
10. TUĞA. ABDULLAH GAVREMOĞLU
11. TUĞA. AHMET TÜRKMEN
12. TUĞA. CEM AZİZ ÇAKMAK
13. TUĞA. LEVENT ERKEK
14. TUĞA. MEHMET FATİH İLĞAR
15. TUĞA. LEVENT GÖRGEÇ
16. TUĞA. OSMAN KAYALAR
17. TUĞA. ŞAFAK YÜREKLİ
18. TUĞA. FAHRİ CAN YILDIRIM
HAVA KUVVETLERİ KOMUTANLIĞI
1. ORG. BİLGİN BALANLI
2. KORG. ZİYA GÜLER
3. KORG. KORCAN POLATSÜ
4. KORG. RIDVAN ULUGÜLER
5. KORG. TURGUT ATMAN
6. TÜMG. BEYAZIT KARATAŞ (Teslim olmadı)
7. TÜMG. NEDİM GÜNGÖR KURUBAŞ
8. TÜMG. İSMAİL TAŞ
9. TÜMG. BÜLENT KOCABABUÇ
10. TUĞG. MUSTAFA ERHAN PAMUK
11. TUĞG. MEHMET ELDEM
12. TUĞG. KUBİLAY BALOĞLU
JANDARMA GENEL KOMUTANLIĞI
1. TÜMG. HALİL HELVACIOĞLU
2. TUĞG. ALİ AYDIN
3. TUĞG. BULUT ÖMER MİMİROĞLU
SAHİL GÜVENLİK KOMUTANLIĞI
1. TUĞA. TURGAY ERDAĞ
372 GENERAL VE AMİRALİN TAM LİSTESİ
TSK'da mevcut 372 muvazzaf general ve amiralin isimleri şöyle: (İsimlerden sonraki yıllar son rütbeye terfi yıllarıdır):
KARA KUVVETLERİ KOMUTANLIĞI
1. ORG. NECDET ÖZEL 2007
2. ORG. ASLAN GÜNER 2008
3. ORG. HAYRİ KIVRIKOĞLU 2008
4. ORG. HÜSEYİN NUSRET TAŞDELER 2009
5. ORG. YALÇIN ATAMAN 2010
6. ORG. SERVET YÖRÜK 2010
7. ORG. HULUSİ AKAR 2011
8. ORG. ABDULLAH ATAY 2011
9. ORG. AHMET TURMUŞ 2011
10. KORG. İSMAİL HAKKI PEKİN 2006
11. KORG. NEJAT BEK 2006
12. KORG. ÖMER NECATİ ÖZBAHADIR 2006
13. KORG. MUSTAFA KORKUT ÖZARSLAN 2007
14. KORG. GALİP MENDİ 2007
15. KORG. MEHMET EMİN ALPMAN 2008
16. KORG. YURDAER OLCAN 2008
17. KORG. TEVFİK ÖZKILIÇ 2008
18. KORG. RAİF AKBAŞ 2008
19. KORG. MEHMET ERÖZ 2008
20. KORG. NAZIM ALTINTAŞ 2009
21. KORG. SALİH ZEKİ ÇOLAK 2009
22. KORG. ADEM HUDUTİ 2009
23. KORG. ÜMİT DÜNDAR 2009
24. KORG. YAŞAR GÜLER 2009
25. KORG. ABDULLAH RECEP 2010
26. KORG. KAMİL BAŞOĞLU 2010
27. KORG. HÜSEYİN KENAN HÜSNÜOĞLU 2010
28. KORG. ORHAN AKBAŞ 2010
29. KORG. TAHİR BEKİROĞLU 2011
30. KORG. İSMAİL SERDAR SAVAŞ 2011
31. KORG. YILDIRIM GÜVENÇ 2011
32. KORG. İHSAN UYAR 2011
33. KORG. ALAEDDİN ÖRSAL 2011
34. TÜMG. AHMET YAVUZ 2005
35. TÜMG. SALİM ERKAL BEKTAŞ 2005
36. TÜMG. ABDULLAH DALAY 2006
37. TÜMG. İHSAN BALABANLI 2006
38. TÜMG. GÜRBÜZ KAYA 2006
39. TÜMG. YÜKSEL ÖZTEKİN 2007
40. TÜMG. BERKAY TURGUT 2007
41. TÜMG. YAŞAR BAL 2007
42. TÜMG. MUSA AVSEVER 2007
43. TÜMG. ÖMER BAYRAKLI 2007
44. TÜMG. ORHAN TURFAN 2007
45. TÜMG. ERDAL ÖZTÜRK 2008
46. TÜMG. ATİLLA GÜRDERE 2008
47. TÜMG. FERİT GÜLER 2008
48. TÜMG. HASAN FEHMİ CANAN 2008
49. TÜMG. MEHMET DAYSAL 2008
50. TÜMG. METİN İYİDİL 2008
51. TÜMG. ÖMER PAÇ 2008
52. TÜMG. AHMET TAMER BÜYÜKKANTARCIOĞLU 2008
53. TÜMG. VEYSİ SUNAL 2008
54. TÜMG. BEKİR MEMİŞ 2008
55. TÜMG. ALPASLAN ERDOĞAN 2008
56. TÜMG. ABDULLAH BARUTÇU 2009
57. TÜMG. FAHRİ KIR 2009
58. TÜMG. İLHAN TALU 2009
59. TÜMG. MUHARREM YAVAŞ 2009
60. TÜMG. ERGÜDER TOPTAŞ 2009
61. TÜMG. MUSTAFA BAKICI 2009
62. TÜMG. UĞUR TARIK ÖZKUT 2009
63. TÜMG. TANER DÜVENCİ 2009
64. TÜMG. NURETTİN IŞIK 2009
65. TÜMG. HALUK CUMALİ ÇETİNKAYA 2009
66. TÜMG. SEZAİ BOSTANCI 2009
67. TÜMG. İBRAHİM YILMAZ 2010
68. TÜMG. ŞENOL ALPARSLAN 2010
69. TÜMG. YILMAZ UYAR 2010
70. TÜMG. UĞUR TARÇIN 2010
71. TÜMG. TAYFUN ÖZDEN 2010
72. TÜMG. MEHMET FARUK ŞENGÜN 2010
73. TÜMG. İSMAİL METİN TEMEL 2010
74. TÜMG. ŞEREF ÖNGAY 2010
75. TÜMG. SADIK ÇELİKÖRS 2010
76. TÜMG. METİN GÜRAK 2010
77. TÜMG. SALİH ULUSOY 2010
78. TÜMG. HIFZI ÇUBUKLU 2010
79. TÜMG. YAVUZ TÜRKGENCİ 2011
80. TÜMG. TAYYAR SÜNGÜ 2011
81. TÜMG. İSHAK CEYLAN 2011
82. TÜMG. ERDOĞAN AKYOL 2011
83. TÜMG. METE SALT 2011
84. TÜMG. SATI BAHADIR KÖSE 2011
85. TÜMG. MUSTAFA ÖZSOY 2011
86. TÜMG. GÖKTÜRK GÖKBAYRAK 2011
87. TÜMG. İLHAN BÖLÜK 2011
88. TÜMG. ALİ DOĞAN İNCE 2011
89. TÜMG. İLYAS BOZKURT 2011
90. TUĞG. ORHAN KÖPRÜ 2004
91. TUĞG. HAMZA KOÇYİĞİT 2006
92. TUĞG. MEHMET ALİ YILDIRIM 2006
93. TUĞG. KASIM ERDEM 2006
94. TUĞG. ASIM BÜLENT AKER 2006
95. TUĞG. LEVENT GÖZKAYA 2007
96. TUĞG. ERSUN ALTUNSOY 2007
97. TUĞG. İZZET ÇETİNGÖZ 2007
98. TUĞG. OSMAN ÜNLÜ 2007
99. TUĞG. MURAT ÜÇÜNCÜ 2007
100. TUĞG. FEVZİ CÖMERT 2007
101. TUĞG. VELİ YILDIRIM 2008
102. TUĞG. ALİ GÜNDOĞAN 2008
103. TUĞG. ETHEM BÜYÜKIŞIK 2008
104. TUĞG. SALİH SEVİL 2008
105. TUĞG. İSMAİL GÜMÜŞTEKİN 2008
106. TUĞG. OSMAN ERBAŞ 2008
107. TUĞG. BURHANETTİN AKTI 2008
108. TUĞG. MÜJDAT UZUN 2008
109. TUĞG. HALİT GÜNBATAR 2008
110. TUĞG. MUZAFFER DİRİK 2008
111. TUĞG. NEVZAT KILINÇ 2008
112. TUĞG. ALİ RIZA KUĞU 2008
113. TUĞG. BAKİ KAVUN 2008
114. TUĞG. ÖMER FARUK KÜÇÜK 2008
115. TUĞG. LOKMAN EKİNCİ 2008
116. TUĞG. MUHİTTİN YENİKEÇECİ 2008
117. TUĞG. GÜRSEL ÖZTÜRK 2008
118. TUĞG. CENGİZ DEMİRCİ 2008
119. TUĞG. TACİ KURUL 2008
120. TUĞG. ALİ SİVRİ 2008
121. TUĞG. FERHAT ÖZGEN 2008
122. TUĞG. SADIK PİYADE 2008
123. TUĞG. GÖKHAN GÖKAY 2008
124. TUĞG. ORHAN ÇINAR 2008
125. TUĞG. YILDIRIM ALEL 2009
126. TUĞG. FERHAT ÖZSOY 2009
127. TUĞG. SUAT DÖNMEZ 2009
128. TUĞG. SELÇUK BAYRAKTAROĞLU 2009
129. TUĞG. MUSTAFA ŞENOL 2009
130. TUĞG. MEHMET OKKAN 2009
131. TUĞG. OĞUZ SERHAD HABİBOĞLU 2009
132. TUĞG. AHMET CAN ÇEVİK 2009
133. TUĞG. ALİ ŞAHİN İŞLEYEN 2009
134. TUĞG. SELİM MERT 2009
135. TUĞG. İSMAİL HAKKI ÖNDER 2009
136. TUĞG. AVNİ ANGUN 2009
137. TUĞG. NEJDET YATGIN 2009
138. TUĞG. MEHMET KAYA 2009
139. TUĞG. METİN KEŞAP 2009
140. TUĞG. HAKAN AKKOÇ 2009
141. TUĞG. MEHMET FARUK ALPAYDIN 2009
142. TUĞG. NEHİR AYDIN 2009
143. TUĞG. YÜCEL KARAUZ 2009
144. TUĞG. ZEKAİ AKSAKALLI 2009
145. TUĞG. ORHAN BÜYÜKGÜNGÖR 2009
146. TUĞG. FATİH BENGİ 2009
147. TUĞG. ALİ AKİF VURUCU 2009
148. TUĞG. MUHARREM METİN ÖZBEK 2010
149. TUĞG. MUZAFFER SÖNMEZ 2010
150. TUĞG. MEHMET AKYÜREK 2010
151. TUĞG. MUSTAFA UZUN 2010
152. TUĞG. ÖMER ÇEVİK GENÇTÜRK 2010
153. TUĞG. HÜSEYİN HAMDİ ERGÜN 2010
154. TUĞG. MEHMET ÖZOĞLU 2010
155. TUĞG. ATİLLA ŞİRİN 2010
156. TUĞG. MEMDUH HAKBİLEN 2010
157. TUĞG. YAVUZ SELİM KAHVECİ 2010
158. TUĞG. HALİL İBRAHİM ERGiN 2010
159. TUĞG. SİNAN YAYLA 2010
160. TUĞG. MUSTAFA AYSAN 2010
161. TUĞG. HAKAN ATINÇ 2010
162. TUĞG. KAHRAMAN GÜNE? 2010
163. TUĞG. RAFET SEVİNÇ ŞAŞMAZ 2010
164. TUĞG. METİN AKKAYA 2010
165. TUĞG. ABDULLAH BAYSAR 2010
166. TUĞG. MEHMET HALUK YILDIZDAN 2010
167. TUĞG. VELİ TARAKCI 2010
168. TUĞG. LEVENT KÖSE 2010
169. TUĞG. KEMAL KORKMAZ 2010
170. TUĞG. ERKAN ATALAY 2010
171. TUĞG. RIZA ÇAĞATAY ERDOĞAN 2010
172. TUĞG. ASIM KOCAOĞLU 2011
173. TUĞG. LOKMAN ALİ YILMAZ 2011
174. TUĞG. KEMAL YENİ 2011
175. TUĞG. MEHMET ŞÜKRÜ EKEN 2011
176. TUĞG. HASAN NEVZAT TAŞDELER 2011
177. TUĞG. ERHAN UZUN 2011
178. TUĞG. KEMAL BAŞAK 2011
179. TUĞG. MUSTAFA İLTER 2011
180. TUĞG. BİLGEHAN SAYMAZ 2011
181. TUĞG. MEHMET TOPÇU 2011
182. TUĞG. HALİL ERKEK 2011
183. TUĞG. ORHAN GÜNDÜZ 2011
184. TUĞG. ŞAFAK GÖK 2011
185. TUĞG. MEHMET GÖKTAN 2011
186. TUĞG. NUR? CANKIYMAZ 2011
187. TUĞG. MEHMET KARADAYI 2011
188. TUĞG. MEHMET DİŞLİ 2011
189. TUĞG. CELALETTİN BACANLI 2011
190. TUĞG. GÜRSEL YÜZ 2011
191. TUĞG. NECDET TUNA 2011
192. TUĞG. ZEKİ GÜRCAN 2011
193. TUĞG. NECATİ TEKİN 2011
194. TUĞG. MESUT BEDRİ USTA 2011
195. TUĞG. MUZAFFER ÖZTOSUN 2011
DENİZ KUVVETLERİ KOMUTANLIĞI
1. ORA. EMİN MURAT BiLGEL 2009
2. ORA. NUSRET GÜNER 2011
3. KORA. MEHMET OTUZBİROĞLU 2006
4. KORA. KADİR SAĞDIÇ 2008
5. KORA. RECEP BÜLENT BOSTANOĞLU 2009
6. KORA. ABDULLAH CAN ERENOĞLU 2009
7. KORA. DENİZ CORA 2010
8. KORA. VEYSEL KÖSELE 2011
9. TÜMA. HALİT ÖZKOÇ 2006
10. TÜMA. HAYDAR MÜCAHİT ŞİŞLİOĞLU 2007
11. TÜMA. ATİLLA KEZEK 2007
12. TÜMA. RAMAZAN CEM GÜRDENİZ 2008
13. TÜMA. FİKRET GÜNEŞ 2008
14. TÜMA. HASAN UŞAKLIOĞLU 2009
15. TÜMA. SONER POLAT 2009
16. TÜMA. ALİ SEMİH ÇETİN 2009
17. TÜMA. ERDEM CANER BENER 2010
18. TÜMA. AHMET SİNAN ERTU?RUL 2010
19. TÜMA. KEMALETTİN GÜR 2011
20. TÜMA. HASAN ŞÜKRÜ KORLU 2011
21. TÜMA. EMİN SAMİ ÖRGÜÇ 2011
22. TUĞA. ABDULLAH GAVREMO?LU 2005
23. TUĞA. AHMET TÜRKMEN 2006
24. TUĞA. İSMAİL TAYLAN 2007
25. TUĞA. SUALP TAYFUN ATILIR 2007
26. TUĞA. NADİR HAKAN ERAYDIN 2007
27. TUĞA. ERCÜMENT TATLIOĞLU 2007
28. TUĞA. MUSTAFA EKMEL ÖZDENGİL 2008
29. TUĞA. CEM AZİZ ÇAKMAK 2008
30. TUĞA. SERDAR OKAN KIRÇİÇEK 2008
31. TUĞA. LEVENT ERKEK 2008
32. TUĞA. MEHMET FATİH İLĞAR 2008
33. TUĞA. ADNAN ÖZBAL 2008
34. TUĞA. GÜNDÜZ ALP DEMİRUS 2009
35. TUĞA. MACİT ARSLAN 2009
36. TUĞA. AHMET İSKENDER YILDIRIM 2009
37. TUĞA. LEVENT GÖRGEÇ 2009
38. TUĞA. HAKAN ÜSTEM 2009
39. TUĞA. MESUT ÖZEL 2009
40. TUĞA. OSMAN KAYALAR 2009
41. TUĞA. ÖMER FARUK HARMANCIK 2010
42. TUĞA. SİNAN AZMİ TOSUN 2010
43. TUĞA. ŞAFAK YÜREKLİ 2010
44. TUĞA. FAHRİ CAN YILDIRIM 2010
45. TUĞA. HASAN DOĞAN 2010
46. TUĞA. ALİ SADİ ÜNSAL 2010
47. TUĞA. MEHMET ŞEVKİ ŞEKEREFELİ 2010
48 TUĞA. MUSTAFA ZEKİ UĞURLU 2011
49. TUĞA. ALİ MURAT DEDE 2011
50. TUĞA. AYDIN ŞİRİN 2011
51. TUĞA. HASAN NİHAT DOĞAN 2011
52. TUĞA. MUHİTTİN ELGİN 2011
53. TUĞA. HAYRETTİN İMREN 2011
54. TUĞA. AHMET ÇAKIR 2011
HAVA KUVVETLERİ KOMUTANLIĞI
1. ORG. BİLGİN BALANLI 2009
2. ORG. MEHMET ERTEN 2011
3. KORG. ZİYA GÜLER 2006
4. KORG. KORCAN POLATSÜ 2006
5. KORG. ABİDİN ÜNAL 2008
6. KORG. MEHMET VEYSİ AĞAR 2008
7. KORG. AKIN ÖZTÜRK 2009
8. KORG. RIDVAN ULUGÜLER 2009
9. KORG. TURGUT ATMAN 2010
10. KORG. NEJAT BİLGİN 2010
11. KORG. NEZİH DAMCI 2011
12. KORG. MEHMET ÇETİN 2011
13. TÜMG. SEMİH BİRDOĞAN 2006
14. TÜMG. BEYAZIT KARATAŞ 2007
15. TÜMG. ATİLLA ÖZLER 2007
16. TÜMG. ATİLLA GÜLAN 2008
17. TÜMG. NEDİM GÜNGÖR KURUBAŞ 2008
18. TÜMG. HASAN KÜÇÜKAKYÜZ 2008
19. TÜMG. MEHMET ŞANVER 2008
20. TÜMG. İSMAİL TAŞ 2009
21. TÜMG. TAYFUR FİKRET ERBİLGİN 2009
22. TÜMG. YALÇIN ERGÜL 2009
23. TÜMG. HASAN HÜSEYİN DEMİRARSLAN 2010
24. TÜMG. NİHAT KÖKMEN 2010
25. TÜMG. BÜLENT KOCABABUÇ 2010
26. TÜMG. ALİ DEMİRAL 2010
27. TÜMG. AYHAN GÜMÜŞ 2010
28. TÜMG. MUHİTTİN FATİH SERT 2011
29. TÜMG. ZİYA CEMAL KADIOĞLU 2011
30. TÜMG. ATEŞ MEHMET İREZ 2011
31. TÜMG. YILMAZ ÖZKAYA 2011
32. TÜMG. ATİLLA ÖZTÜRK 2011
33. TUĞG. MUSTAFA İLHAN 2007
34. TUĞG. HA ŞMET CİHANGİR KADAKAL 2007
35. TUĞG. AHMET LEVENT TAŞTAN 2008
36. TUĞG. HALUK SELVİ 2008
37. TUĞG. KUBİLAY SELÇUK 2008
38. TUĞG. MEHMET ÖZLÜ 2008
39. TUĞG. SAMİ FINDIKOĞLU 2008
40. TUĞG. MUSTAFA AVCI 2008
41. TUĞG. ERDOĞAN ARSLANTAŞ 2008
42. TUĞG. CEVAT YAZGILI 2008
43. TUĞG. MURAT YILDIRIM 2009
44. TUĞG. ALİ ÇETİNKAYA 2009
45. TUĞG. MEHMET TÜMAY ÖZER 2009
46. TUĞG. MUSTAFA ERHAN PAMUK 2009
47. TUĞG. İSMAİL GÜNEYKAYA 2009
48. TUĞG. HALUK ŞAHAR 2009
49. TUĞG. SALİM CÜNEYT KAVUNCU 2009
50. TUĞG. MEHMET ARGUN 2009
51. TUĞG. RECEP YÜKSEL 2009
52. TUĞG. İDRİS AKSOY 2010
53. TUĞG. HAKAN TAŞKESEN 2010
54. TUĞG. MEHMET ELDEM 2010
55. TUĞG. MEHMET UĞUR BALKIŞ 2010
56. TUĞG. KUBİLAY BALOĞLU 2010
57. TUĞG. MEHMET CAHİT BAKIR 2010
58. TUIG. İSMAİL YALÇIN 2010
59. TUĞG. GÖKSEL KAHYA 2010
60. TUĞG. FETHİ ALPAY 2011
61. TUĞG. SERDAR GÜLBAŞ 2011
62. TUĞG. SEMİH KOŞUCUOĞLU 2011
63. TUĞG. ATİLLA DARENDELİ 2011
64. TUĞG. SUAT MURAT SEMİZ 2011
65. TUĞG. ŞABAN UMUT 2011
66. TUĞG. UĞUR BULDU 2011
67. TUĞG. KORAY UZ 2011
68. TUĞG. AHMET CURAL 2011
69. TUĞG. İHSAN ÖZDAMAR 2011
JANDARMA GENEL KOMUTANLIĞI
1. ORG. BEKİR KALYONCU 2009
2. KORG. FİKRET DEMİRTAŞ 2007
3. KORG. OSMAN EKER 2008
4. KORG. İBRAHİM YAŞAR 2011
5. TÜMG. HALİL HELVACIOĞLU 2005
6. TÜMG. TUNAY BİLGEN 2007
7. TÜMG. MEHMET ÇÖRTEN 2008
8. TÜMG. MUSTAFA KEMAL ALATAŞ 2008
9. TÜMG. MUSTAFA İHSAN BATI 2009
10. TÜMG. HARUN OCAKLI 2009
11. TÜMG. YUSUF KAYA 2010
12. TÜMG. ATA KALKAN 2010
13. TÜMG. ALİ LAPANTA 2011
14. TÜMG. ARİF ÇETİN 2011
15. TUĞG. ALİ AYDIN 2005
16. TUĞG. ÜMİT YILMAZ 2007
17. TUĞG. MURAT KIRKAYA 2007
18. TUĞG. ÜNAL KARAOSMANOĞLU 2008
19. TUĞG. ZEKİ ES 2008
20. TUĞG. İBRAHİM AYDIN 2008
21. TUĞG. BULUT ÖMER MİMİROĞLU 2008
22. TUĞG. NECDET KÖSE 2009
23. TUĞG. MUSA ÇİTİL 2009
24. TUĞG. SEYFULLAH SALDIK 2009
25. TUĞG. ALİ ÖZKARA 2009
26. TUĞG. ŞAFAK KARAKOÇ 2009
27. TUĞG. ALİ ÇARDAKÇI 2010
28. TUĞG. SALİH KARATAŞ 2010
29. TUĞG. GÜRAY ALPAR 2010
30. TUĞG. NAMIK BORAN 2010
31. TUĞG. NİYAZİ ERHAN PATIR 2011
32. TUĞG. NECDET GÜNGÖR 2011
33. TUĞG. HACI İLBAŞ 2011
34. TUĞG. HACI ABDULLAH DOĞAN 2011
SAHİL GÜVENLİK KOMUTANLIĞI
1. TÜMA. SERDAR DÜLGER 2008
2. TUĞA. TURGAY ERDAĞ 2008
GATA
1. HV. TÜMG. SADETTİN ÇETİNER 2011
2. TUĞG. YUSUF ZİYA YERGÖK 2005
3. TUĞA. OKAN ÖZCAN 2006
4. TUĞG. MUSTAFA BAŞBOZKURT 2008
5. TUĞA. MEHMET ALİ ÖZGÜVEN 2008
6. TUĞG. DİLAVER ERŞANLI 2008
7. TUĞA. HAYATİ BİLGİÇ 2009
8. TUĞG. FİKRET ARPACI 2010
9. TUĞG. YUSUF PEKER 2011
10. TUĞG. UFUK DEMİRKILIÇ 2010
11. TUĞA. BEKİR SITKI CEBECİ 2010
12. HV. TUĞG. CAN POLAT EYİGÜN 2010
13. TUĞG. HALİL İBRAHİM ALTINSOY 2011.
14. TUĞG. SAİT BAĞCI 2011
15. TUĞA. CEM TAYFUN 2011
16. TUĞG. MEHMET LEVHİ AKIN 2011
AYİM VE ASKERİ YARGITAY
1. TUĞG. ABDULLAH ARSLAN 2010
2. TUĞG. HASAN DENGİZ 2010
Odatv.com
29.08.2011